<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Simon Hackett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simonhackett.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simonhackett.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the field</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 05:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Simon by serehfa</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[serehfa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 05:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.wordpress.com/?page_id=2#comment-170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The plates on the Tesla are a winner. 
I wondered where you&#039;d got to :) as its been more than a decade since I saw you last, in Sydney. Hope things are going well. 
Cheers,
A]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plates on the Tesla are a winner.<br />
I wondered where you&#8217;d got to <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  as its been more than a decade since I saw you last, in Sydney. Hope things are going well.<br />
Cheers,<br />
A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by simonhackett</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[simonhackett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re going to pull through a new cable, the new cable you pull through is fibre. Its the only sane answer, as the dominant cost is the labour cost.

Indeed that is an intended part of the plan -there are provisions in the design and development of the NBN process to have installers use the copper as a draw-string to pull in a fibre lead-in where that is possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to pull through a new cable, the new cable you pull through is fibre. Its the only sane answer, as the dominant cost is the labour cost.</p>
<p>Indeed that is an intended part of the plan -there are provisions in the design and development of the NBN process to have installers use the copper as a draw-string to pull in a fibre lead-in where that is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by John Heller</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Heller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I didn&#039;t realize when Malcolm Turnbull was explaining FTTN technology was that &quot;copper&quot; meant the crappy old exisiting Tesltra (or Telecom Australia or Post Master General&#039;s) cables. I was think more of underground rated Cat 5 or Cat 6 cable, which actually is Gigabit capable. Does the FTTN system actually rely on reusing the existing copper or could you pull through modern cables. Would this actually save any money? Would laying new modern copper be much cheaper than laying new fibre. What if they use the old copper as a draw wire?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I didn&#8217;t realize when Malcolm Turnbull was explaining FTTN technology was that &#8220;copper&#8221; meant the crappy old exisiting Tesltra (or Telecom Australia or Post Master General&#8217;s) cables. I was think more of underground rated Cat 5 or Cat 6 cable, which actually is Gigabit capable. Does the FTTN system actually rely on reusing the existing copper or could you pull through modern cables. Would this actually save any money? Would laying new modern copper be much cheaper than laying new fibre. What if they use the old copper as a draw wire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by Ayden Beeson</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayden Beeson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 03:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@1Tintin2, sorry, your misspelling &quot;experienced&quot; as &quot;biased&quot;. Watch the presentation again, i think he presents everything in a completely non-biased argument with both sides clearly explained. Take it from somebody who works in this field (I work as a senior networks tech at a large regional university), you dont do vDSL if you want to do it properly first time around.

It saddens me to see the liberals pushing their policy with such blatent gaps in their policy, while also arguing greater transparency.

If they were serious, they would be talking about the fact their upload speeds are much lower, their costs are not even close given the additional&#039;s brought on by the Telstra renegotiation, powered noded, maintenance etc and the figure they are using now for the Labour NBN costs is made up by Malcolm T on the spot but is being touted as fact (Our local MP here even used it to do a cost comparison to us in an email response)

@Simonhackett, cheers for sharing this presentation, i dont suppose you have the Q&amp;A questions written down? Some are not very clear (your answers are fine, just their questions)

Also, your wordpress register link seems to be broken and I cant log in to reply to people with a facebook account :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1Tintin2, sorry, your misspelling &#8220;experienced&#8221; as &#8220;biased&#8221;. Watch the presentation again, i think he presents everything in a completely non-biased argument with both sides clearly explained. Take it from somebody who works in this field (I work as a senior networks tech at a large regional university), you dont do vDSL if you want to do it properly first time around.</p>
<p>It saddens me to see the liberals pushing their policy with such blatent gaps in their policy, while also arguing greater transparency.</p>
<p>If they were serious, they would be talking about the fact their upload speeds are much lower, their costs are not even close given the additional&#8217;s brought on by the Telstra renegotiation, powered noded, maintenance etc and the figure they are using now for the Labour NBN costs is made up by Malcolm T on the spot but is being touted as fact (Our local MP here even used it to do a cost comparison to us in an email response)</p>
<p>@Simonhackett, cheers for sharing this presentation, i dont suppose you have the Q&amp;A questions written down? Some are not very clear (your answers are fine, just their questions)</p>
<p>Also, your wordpress register link seems to be broken and I cant log in to reply to people with a facebook account <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by feilipu</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[feilipu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a couple of things that the NBN fanbois generally fail to note about Liberal Party Broadband Policy. (and I don’t vote, so this is just a technical &amp; economic discussion)

Liberal Policy is not about FTTN at all. FTTN is just a cheap and fast “filler” for areas of Australia that are not being serviced some other way.
Satellite remains.
Fixed wireless remains.
Greenfield FTTH remains.
FTTH On-demand (i.e. for anyone who wants to have it) remains.
HFC (and we know that EuroDOCSIS can do 1Gb/s services, as needed) will be recovered and provide service for 2.2million homes, immediately.

All that is changing is that the difficult brownfields services are being given a fast and cheap alternative to get some kind of service upgrade to everyone in the short term (say 5 to 8 years).

Fanbois bitch about the FTTN cabinets in the street. Yes they’re ugly. Essentially, they’re providing centralised networked power to drive the copper tail for all FTTN subscribers. Cabinets are ugly, but they’re very maintainable, and upgradable at low cost and have low impact on consumers. The current FTTH solution is putting an unmaintainable ugly lead acid battery IN MY LOUNGEROOM! (And, forcing me to pay for the power for their service too. I’m used to getting my POTS power for free.)

And, if (when) the FTTH battery is dead your lifeline services are affected. It is part of every NBNCo service agreement that it is not their liability, if your battery is dead, you can’t make a call, and therefore you die!

I’d rather have someone professional maintaining my (mother’s / great aunt’s / disabled friend’s) lifeline services battery and have it somewhere where it can be properly maintained to deliver a known grade of service.

Oh, and the famous diagram with 1Gb/s FTTH services on it, with everything else miles below. Nice picture. You could have added HFC services up there at 1Gb/s too, but you chose not to.

But paying for these 1Gb/s services is another story.

The NBNCo has gazetted their 100Mb/s prices in a SAU with the ACCC, and their prices will be INCREASED annually by CPI (-1.5%) for 27 YEARS. That means in 27 years we’ll be paying much more than today (compound it up, I dare you) for the same service. They need to lock in this price to pay for their network. Don’t imagine that Moore’s law is going to apply here. 27 years ago was 1986, and then 9600 baud was looking pretty good. How will 100Mb/s look in 2040? Now, how much is then 1Gb/s going to cost, if 100Mb/s has a fixed price for the next 27 years? Good question. You got any unwanted children you can sell?

The Labour NBN plan is unbuildable. There are not the fibre splicers in the country we need to achieve the required daily rate build rate. NBN Co contractors (to get their contracts in the first place) are paying lowest rates in the market. Anyone with any skills is working on the mines in WA, fly in fly out. Not camping in the truck, schlepping around the country digging trenches. This was apparent back in 2010. Blind Freddy could have predicted the situation the NBNCo is in now, with missed delivery targets.

In 15 years, Conroy might be remembered for the man who thought of NBN. But Turnbull will be remembered as the one who saved it, and actually delivered it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of things that the NBN fanbois generally fail to note about Liberal Party Broadband Policy. (and I don’t vote, so this is just a technical &amp; economic discussion)</p>
<p>Liberal Policy is not about FTTN at all. FTTN is just a cheap and fast “filler” for areas of Australia that are not being serviced some other way.<br />
Satellite remains.<br />
Fixed wireless remains.<br />
Greenfield FTTH remains.<br />
FTTH On-demand (i.e. for anyone who wants to have it) remains.<br />
HFC (and we know that EuroDOCSIS can do 1Gb/s services, as needed) will be recovered and provide service for 2.2million homes, immediately.</p>
<p>All that is changing is that the difficult brownfields services are being given a fast and cheap alternative to get some kind of service upgrade to everyone in the short term (say 5 to 8 years).</p>
<p>Fanbois bitch about the FTTN cabinets in the street. Yes they’re ugly. Essentially, they’re providing centralised networked power to drive the copper tail for all FTTN subscribers. Cabinets are ugly, but they’re very maintainable, and upgradable at low cost and have low impact on consumers. The current FTTH solution is putting an unmaintainable ugly lead acid battery IN MY LOUNGEROOM! (And, forcing me to pay for the power for their service too. I’m used to getting my POTS power for free.)</p>
<p>And, if (when) the FTTH battery is dead your lifeline services are affected. It is part of every NBNCo service agreement that it is not their liability, if your battery is dead, you can’t make a call, and therefore you die!</p>
<p>I’d rather have someone professional maintaining my (mother’s / great aunt’s / disabled friend’s) lifeline services battery and have it somewhere where it can be properly maintained to deliver a known grade of service.</p>
<p>Oh, and the famous diagram with 1Gb/s FTTH services on it, with everything else miles below. Nice picture. You could have added HFC services up there at 1Gb/s too, but you chose not to.</p>
<p>But paying for these 1Gb/s services is another story.</p>
<p>The NBNCo has gazetted their 100Mb/s prices in a SAU with the ACCC, and their prices will be INCREASED annually by CPI (-1.5%) for 27 YEARS. That means in 27 years we’ll be paying much more than today (compound it up, I dare you) for the same service. They need to lock in this price to pay for their network. Don’t imagine that Moore’s law is going to apply here. 27 years ago was 1986, and then 9600 baud was looking pretty good. How will 100Mb/s look in 2040? Now, how much is then 1Gb/s going to cost, if 100Mb/s has a fixed price for the next 27 years? Good question. You got any unwanted children you can sell?</p>
<p>The Labour NBN plan is unbuildable. There are not the fibre splicers in the country we need to achieve the required daily rate build rate. NBN Co contractors (to get their contracts in the first place) are paying lowest rates in the market. Anyone with any skills is working on the mines in WA, fly in fly out. Not camping in the truck, schlepping around the country digging trenches. This was apparent back in 2010. Blind Freddy could have predicted the situation the NBNCo is in now, with missed delivery targets.</p>
<p>In 15 years, Conroy might be remembered for the man who thought of NBN. But Turnbull will be remembered as the one who saved it, and actually delivered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why &#8216;Sharing&#8217; a Dropbox folder doesn&#8217;t always work &#8211; and how to fix it by Adrian Bauer (@ajbau)</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/05/dropbox-sharing-doesnt-work-and-the-fi/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Bauer (@ajbau)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=933#comment-162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real conclusion is use Google Drive instead]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real conclusion is use Google Drive instead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by Short Video: NBN vs Copper to the Home &#124; Henry&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Short Video: NBN vs Copper to the Home &#124; Henry&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 05:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/" rel="nofollow">http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by Scott (@scottie8509)</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott (@scottie8509)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank-you Simon, appreciated a pragmatic discussion on the topic, devoid of the flapping from Senator Conroy. If the coalition did not have Malcolm selling the FTTN plan, they would be dead in the water. Perhaps we might end up with Malcolm in 2016 saying &quot;that it was too hard so here is a FTTP network&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank-you Simon, appreciated a pragmatic discussion on the topic, devoid of the flapping from Senator Conroy. If the coalition did not have Malcolm selling the FTTN plan, they would be dead in the water. Perhaps we might end up with Malcolm in 2016 saying &#8220;that it was too hard so here is a FTTP network&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by Arthur Koulianos (@PrepaidPlans)</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Koulianos (@PrepaidPlans)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 03:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be interesting what type of advertising campaign the current govt will deploy to explain the differences between the Coalitions proposals and what is being built, hopefully they can get the point across to the public to vote the right way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting what type of advertising campaign the current govt will deploy to explain the differences between the Coalitions proposals and what is being built, hopefully they can get the point across to the public to vote the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CommsDay Sydney 2013 Summit: The Problem With FTTN by Annie L-Wells</title>
		<link>http://simonhackett.com/2013/04/09/cd-syd-2013-problem-with-fttn/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annie L-Wells]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonhackett.com/?p=955#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Simon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
